For me, technically feasible is, should be, practically feasible. Today, I realized that's just a point of view from I.T. side (or even just from my tiny brain). End users may not agree with that. Why technique can't always be a practice?
I think the reason is Environment. When a kind of technique is placed in an environment, there are possibilities of incapability. The cause of incapability can be anything but I'm sure labour is among the major ones. It can be not enough labour, no labour with specific skills, ... you name it. Imagine an organization wants to build a giant e-dictionary but it has only a few team members available, even though they have software, computers to achieve.
Anyway, discussion helps you to discover something new and reveal something you neglect. Hope to have more in the future. (However, only 1.5 month left ...)
Tag!! Beyond Barrier Blog Weblog
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Category
- Cool West (5)
- Info.Tango (14)
- MTV (14)
- music (11)
- 同一天空 / One World (6)
- 感想 / Feeling (50)
- 旅遊 / Travel (3)
- 生活 / Life (55)
- 閱與電影 (7)
Links
1 comment:
I think human factor is among other things that makes technically feasible becomes practically infeasible. For example, all the techniques and manpower are there, but people just do not want the change. As a teacher, I may say that computerised teaching is technically feasible but practically infeasible. You still need the role of a teacher to facilitate the learning. And most important of all, I don't want to be redundant!
Post a Comment